Mary Roach is known for her humorous approach to scientific questions, whether it's an exploration of the human digestive system in Gulp or the death industry in Stiff. In Fuzz, she examines the curious state of human-wildlife conflict and what should be done when the needs of non-human animals come in conflict with modern society?
When I was an undergrad it was all about, How do we bring these populations back? How do we count them, manage them? Now it’s all about human-wildlife interactions. How do we manage this? We’re seeing wildlife biologists going …” Breck mimes banging his head against the table. “The game has changed.” (page 51)
It's interesting to think about how thing have changed with climate change and human migration even in the course of my lifetime.
There are more bears, more wolves and coyotes, and ever more humans moving into their ranges. And no cultural consensus on what should be done when one of those animals ransacks a kitchen or kills some sheep or nips a steakhouse owner’s backside. We have human-wildlife conflict and human-human conflict. We have ranchers and farmers and animal lovers hating on each other in a cultural clash that can feel as dug-in as the politics in this country. Kill them all! Don’t harm a single one! (page 51)
The divisions over how to treat wildlife threats are probably just as huge as the divide between Republicans and Democrats.
Here in Uttarakhand’s Pauri Garhwal district, leopards stalk humans as prey. Every year, in an area smaller than Delaware, leopards typically kill three or four humans. Between 2000 and 2016, Naha reports, leopards attacked humans 159 times. (page 78)
This is just one of the stats in the book that shows that interactions between humans and wildlife are getting more frequent and, at least occasionally, more deadly.
Karelian bear dog (page 38) - Finnish dog breed. SUPER CUTE. It's a hunting dog that hunts large animals including moose, bear, and wild boar.
Fraczek.marcin, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons |
Go look them [yellow-eyed penguins] up. The candy red beak, the pink go-go boots, the yellow mask angling back from the eyes. They’re the Flash, they’re 1970s Bowie! I don’t mean to imply that adorable, showy species are of more value or somehow deserving of more concern. It’s just … damn. (page 253)
Mentions of the word hat:
In return, the military asked only for the feathers of the fallen, to be used as a flourish on the hats of the nation’s light-horsemen. (page 176) - Basically, emus were destroying wheat fields in Western Australia and the military was called in to kill the birds with machine guns.
A series describing the same man using his hat as his main feature:
His cowboy hat is white felt, and the rest is mostly denim. (page 286)
We follow the hat into the interior of Roger’s grain elevator. (page 287)
He removes his hat with one hand and with the other, wipes away sweat. His face is tanned up to where the hat begins, then not. (page 287)
The man in the big white hat gives me hope. (page 288)
I liked this book! I'm a big Mary Roach fan in general, but I really liked learning about all the ways animals and humans cross paths. Finding ways to keep humans and animals apart does seem really ethically murky though. I feel this way about the deer in our suburban neighborhood. There are TOO MANY and they eat my flowers and make a mess on my lawn. But this was their home first... plus, where else are they to go???
ReplyDeleteYes! I think you'd find this book interesting. I think the more ethically murky areas are when animals are seriously injuring/killing humans. It's one thing if deer are eating your flowers, but it's another thing if car-deer accidents are killing people in large numbers. It's one thing if there's a bear in your neighborhood, but it's another thing if the bear is entering homes where people are.
DeleteI love Mary Roach, and I'm team Orca all the way! Indoors, I'm territorial and will do all I can to avoid having mice and ants, but the outdoors belongs to all of us. I do wish chipmunks and deer wouldn't eat my flowers, but yeah--if they do, they do.
ReplyDeleteI think the thing with the orcas is that they have historically not messed with boats and this is unusual behavior, so there's a concern that maybe there's something wrong with the orcas. Or perhaps we're watching orcas evolve in real time. We just don't know and that's a concern because we can't tell boaters how to react when they see orcas now, so it's more dangerous for both humans and orcas. Every interaction humans have with wildlife is so FRAUGHT.
DeleteHmmm! I've never heard of this book- it sounds interesting. I think it would upset me to read about using traps and poison to kill animals, but I get that it's a complicated issue.
ReplyDeleteYes, the section on which methods of killing were most humane was hard to read because most humane would be to just let them live, but of course that's not possible if we're prioritizing human lives. The planet is reaching its carrying capacity for humans, I guess, and we're seeing those consequences.
DeleteNever heard of this author but it seems she has written about some interesting topics. I will have a look into those. Thank you for bringing it to my radar. Not that I need more books to read... sigh...
ReplyDeleteRoach is an interesting author. She tackles tough issues, but in a relatively light way. She has an interesting style and I'd love to know how you feel about her, but I'm not sure I'd move her to the top of you TBR list!
DeleteI wouldn't want to buy her book and the library doesn't seem to have any copies (yet) so it will definitley not end up high on that TBR
Delete