Friday, May 20, 2022

The Art of Losing by Alice Zentiter (translated from French by Frank Wynne)

Our book club book for the month was The Art of Losing by Alice Zeniter. 


Well, it has not been since The Luminaries that I dreaded reading a book club book so much and bitched about reading it. At one point, I actually told my husband that it's no wonder people don't read books if they're reading things like this. It felt like a dreaded homework assignment and I was an absolute pill about it.

It's the story of three generations of an Algerian/French family resonant with themes of the immigrant experience: loss, language, culture, religion, and home. 

The Good: I didn't know much about the Algerian fight for independence or really any of Algeria's history or culture. I feel like I have a better grasp on that now, particularly how badly the French acted in the conflict and how they treated Algerians who moved to France.

The Bad: I don't know if it was a translation issue, but the whole thing was just really slow and boring. I just couldn't connect with any of the characters. 

Book Club Takes: I was the only one to finish and most people did not make it through the first part. There was another person soldiering away, claiming to enjoy the story, but she was the one who recommended it in the first place, so I'm pretty sure she was just being a bit defensive.

I think our main take was that this book was told mostly from the perspective of the men in the book and it would have been more interesting for us if it had included more female perspectives. I like a book in which someone who is on the periphery of Big Things is telling the story because you get a firsthand tale, but it's usually someone who has a little more distance from the decision making to sort of tell you as a reader if the things that are happening really make sense. The grandmother figure in this book could have been the narrator for the whole thing and it would have been super interesting. Or have her narrate the first part, the mother narrate the second part, and then there would have been no men as central figures.  Oh, well. That's not the book we read.  

I definitely would not have finished this book if it hadn't been for book club. 

2/5 stars

Lines of note:

Marriage is order, structure. Love is chaos - even when it is joyful. It is hardly surprising that the two do not go together. It is hardly surprising that people choose to build a family, a home, on the foundations of an enduring institution, on a straightforward contract rather than on the quicksand of emotions. (page 94)

Interesting perspective from a culture that has arranged marriages.

And often, among the hulking bodies of the adults, he sees the frail face of a child interpreter, a child scribe who reminds him of himself, a child he cannot face without being ashamed. (page 282)

There were occasional sentences like this that really boiled down some of the immigrant experiences people talk about a lot into simple, powerful statements.

Things I looked up:

Ben Bella (page 157) - Leader in the Algerian War of Independence who became the first prime minister and first elected president of the Algerian republic. 

Hieratic (page 308) - of, or concerning priests

Makroud (page 311) - This is a popular Algerian dessert. I made some and took it along to our meeting and it was delicious, although I'm sure some Algerian grandmother could have made it much better.

Shootings at Toulouse and Montauban (page 320) - A series of terrorist attacks in France in 2012.

November 13, 2015 Bataclan (page 321) -  Terrorist attacks in Paris.

Matoub Lounes (page 389) - Absolutely fascinating character. Algerian singer and poet who was an advocated for human rights and secularism in Algeria. His atheistic proclamations made him unpopular with both sides of the civil war and his assassination sparked riots.  

6 comments:

  1. This is one of the reasons I'm wary of book clubs.
    Also I just love how you write. It makes me laugh so often, but in the most relatable way.
    "It felt like a dreaded homework assignment and I was an absolute pill about it."
    And this:
    "There was another person soldiering away, claiming to enjoy the story, but she was the one who recommended it in the first place, so I'm pretty sure she was just being a bit defensive."
    You make reading about a book not worth reading (I'm saying that loosely as it sounds like there were some redeeming qualities)...very entertaining reading <3

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love that my book club pushes me to read things I would never read. Sure, I didn't LOVE this book, but I did learn something and so it was worth it to me. Not every book is a slam dunk, but I read my first Tayari Jones at book club, read Piranesi and The Overstory because of book club, and I get to hang out with smart people talking about smart things once every six weeks or so. It's totally worth it to me!

      Delete
  2. Well, I think you guys should find a new way to choose your books in the future! I love how you were the only way to finish this one. I also love how you made Makroud in an attempt to salvage the situation. It sounds like there were some interesting aspects to this book- but not enough to make up for the rest of is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We really don't have a good system for choosing books. We have a shared spreadsheet, but we rarely consult it. I think I'm really the only one who updates it, to be honest. Oh, well. It works (mostly) for us at choosing books that lead to a good discussion. Even though no one really loved this book, we had an interesting talk about how it could have been better and what we learned from it. Sometimes it's hard to have a discussion surrounding a book we all loved because all we can do is gush over it!

      Delete
  3. Ugh. I hate it when book club books are a slog because I typically force myself to finish book club books. Our system is that every person suggests 3 books at the start of the year. For our first meeting in early Jan, each person talks about their 3 books, then we all vote and the cadence for books is based on library availability. Our club is huge users of the library so it works well to do it this way. That way people have some vested interest in what we read since we all vote. Prior to this, the host would pick the book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is way more work than our book club would probably do! Also, we try not to read books someone has already read because then it's sort of a bummer for them that month. It does sound like you'd get fewer stinkers with your method, but only if the folks in your club have the same taste in books as you do!

      Delete