I'm not great about keeping reading stats, to be honest with you. But I was a little jealous of Stephany's reading stats for 2021, so I'm trying to be better about tracking some things because she was kind enough to send me her spreadsheet categories. That's neither here nor there, but something that did come up when I was compiling my own (pathetic) 2021 stats was that last year I only read three (3!!!) non-fiction books last year. I was definitely avoiding reality and it was really easy to see when I realized that most books I read were romance and science-fiction/fantasy. ANYWAY. This year, I'm already doing better. I've already read three non-fiction books THIS YEAR and Come Fly the World: The Jet-Age Story of the Women of Pan Am by Julia Cookie is number four. I am taking small steps towards less junk in my reading diet.
Anyway, this book is about the stewardesses of Pan Am. Before there were flight attendants, before men could help people in the cabin, and before it was illegal to discriminate against pregnant women in the United States, there was Pan Am. With its signature Pan Am blue and pillbox hat uniform, the job of stewardess was a highly sought one in a time before women had many acceptable professions, let alone professions that would allow people to travel internationally.
There was a lot of interesting material in this book, from how the airline started as one that would only fly international flights to its role in managing troop deployment in Vietnam to its airlifting of orphans out of Vietnam in the waning days of American involvement in that conflict. There's also a fair amount about what an important role the airline played in the burgeoning feminist movement in the United States.
All of that aside, this book is an organizational nightmare. It follows the stories of several different stewardesses and keeps jumping back and forth among them until a few of them meet up on one of the orphan transports. I *think* the organization is supposed to be told in a linear timeline of sorts, but because we're reading about one woman's experience and then jumping to another's, it's impossible to keep track of where we are in time. That, combined with the tangents into societal and political happenings, led to this being a frustrating read. There's so much here, but it just wasn't organized in a way that made any sense.
3/5 stars
Lines of note:
"On the President Special to Paris, Pan Am gave women passengers orchids and perfume and men cigars after a seven-course meal." (page 10)
Could you even imagine what that plane smelled like? Gross.
"Anyone could get married, was the consensus among the Hong Kong crews. Not everyone could smuggle a newsreel from the war in Pakistan to Hong Kong for a journalist acquaintance or keep a cabin cool while coming into unexpected fire on a flight to Da Nang. To do that and then, later that night, after a date - because why go home at two? - to know the door code for the after-hours club where you could dance until the sun's light dimmed the glowing neon bar signs outside, to luxuriate in the company and the cocktails and the feeling of a young body, alive and all yours, moving passionately - that was the life they sought." (page 100)
This makes the whole thing sound vaguely unpleasant to me. It's obvious that I never would have been one of those people trying to become a Pan Am stewardess.
"For years, enormous numbers of stewardesses had rejected company rules in secret. They slipped subversive wedding bands on and off their fingers between flights. An estimated 30 to 40 percent of stewardesses hid their marriages from management and kept flying." (page 101)
I chose this because it's fascinating, but also because it's a page after the previous quote. How did the author go from clubbing in Hong Kong to hiding marriages in one page? She did it by not caring about transitions or things making a lot of sense.
Things I looked up:
palynology (page 5) - The study of plant pollen, spores, and microscopic planktonic organisms, living and in fossil form.
Pan Am building/Marvel or monster? (page 10) - It's been renamed the MetLife Building. When it was built, it was highly criticized for its uniqueness and jarring nature. I don't think it's so bad, but what do I know?
|
A 1963 photograph of the controversial Pan Am Building.Credit...Joseph A. Molitor/Avery Architectural and Fine Arts Library, Columbia University |
Barbara Perkins (page 31) - A Canadian-American former actress, singer, and dancer. She's 79!
1962 Pan Am Terminal at JFK (page 63) - One of the "most iconic airport terminals of the twentieth century," I guess.
We're just opposite! I read almost exclusively non-fiction (75% I'd guess). I wouldn't consider fiction, junk, though. I think books fill specific needs in our lives, and if you enjoy fiction...I would run with that! I know people that read exclusively one type of book...and think that's just fine. I really do prefer non-fiction and that's what I stick with; I've been trying harder to incorporate more modern fiction and...it just always feels like a bit of a slog. In general I'm doing classic literature (50+ years old) and non-fiction and telling myself reading should be fun and I don't HAVE to be looking to stretch myself or fit a particular mold. For a long time I beat myself up over reading habits, but that took some of the joy out of reading. Now my goal is to read things I enjoy and be content with that.
ReplyDeleteObviously, if you WANT to read more non-fiction I'd say go for it, but life is too short to read books that we don't enjoy (I don't mean we can't read "hard" books or on topics that stretch up...but things we categorically find uninteresting or unenjoyable)...and feeling this way is a relatively new realization for me. Same with DNF - I used to finish every book I started but in the last few years have decided I am an adult that can choose to stop reading a book! This does not make me a failure. Right?!
I don't mind reading non-fiction. I LOVE to hear people talk about their passions, even if I don't share their enthusiasm and what's more exciting than something someone loves enough to write an entire book about? I just think it was more of a sign of how much I was distancing myself from anything too hard/too real last year. I'm going to aim for at least one non-fiction book every month, but I definitely reserve the right to change my mind about that if I decide running back to the "comfort" of fiction is better for me.
DeleteI started to use a spreadsheet to track my reading this year for the first time in a very long time. I typically would just use goodreads but it doesn't give you much information aside from the total # and average rating and such. So I am using a spreadsheet I received as part of being a Patreon member of Sarah's Bookshelves live. I knew I had read some non-fiction YTD, but was way off on how much! I've read 8 non-fiction books, and just started my 9th, so about 1/3 of my reading has been non-fiction. That has to be much higher than average for me, but I am going off of my sense for the fiction/non-fiction split. It will be nice to have this kind of data for year-over-year trends going forward!
ReplyDeleteThis book does not sounds like a good fit for me either. But the topic seemed promising!
This sounds quite interesting!
ReplyDeleteWhoops, published too soon. I keep a spreadsheet for my reading. It's easy to search to see if I've already read a book or not (I often forget if I've read something or not, which I think happens if you read a lot - does this happen to you?)
ReplyDeleteOh, I do sometimes forget if I've read something! It is actually why I started writing about the books I read on my blog - it's a nice resource to check and see what I thought about something if I forget about it!
DeleteI'm glad my spreadsheet system is working for you! I love tracking what I read and seeing year-over-year trends.
ReplyDeleteI think my ideal fiction/nonfiction split is 60/40. I love both genres but I need more fiction in my life than not.
This book sounds so interesting and promising, but the execution doesn't seem like it... panned out (ha ha ha - I had to!).