Thursday, May 16, 2024

The Christie Affair by Nina de Gramont

Because I have been driving a lot recently, I have downloaded a few audiobooks and The Christie Affair by Nina de Gramont was one of those books.  

In 1926, the author Agatha Christie disappeared for eleven days after a fight with her adulterous husband. When she was found, she claimed to have no memory of what she did during that time. There are two main theories about her disappearance - either she did have temporary amnesia/was in a fugue state or that she intended to embarrass her husband with her disappearance, but never imagined how big the search would be for her. In the true crime community, this nearly one hundred-year-old mystery is still hotly debated. Regardless of the truth, in this book, de Gramont tells the fictionalized story of Agatha's disappearance through the lens of her husband's mistress, Nan O'Dea.  

I struggle with books that seem to glorify adultery. I don't love marriage in peril stories. And, look, Nan's defense of adultery is terrible. But there's more to this book than simply a woman defending her choice to seduce a married man. There's a mystery and a meditation on right and wrong. I found myself swaying from finding Nan's motives repulsive to a kind of sympathy to a deep sadness. 

But the story is from Nan's point of view and if you're interested in Agatha's point of view, too bad. That's not the story de Gramont wanted to tell.  

I liked how de Gramont wove together details from the true story (or what's known to be true, anyway) with things she made up whole cloth. I thought the way she connected the impact of WWI in the interwar period of Europe to Nan and Agatha's lives in particular was crafty. I loved the various settings around Ireland and England. I loved all the scenes with dogs. I did not care for a few of the themes (children are more important than any other human beings, marriage is temporary), but just because I don't like and/or agree with them doesn't mean it wasn't a fascinating listen.

4/5 stars

Lines of note:

A person who has nothing might be excused for taking one thing, a husband, from a person who has everything. (timestamp 17:38)

What an excuse for becoming an adulterer! 

She didn't even think of herself as an author. Her primary occupation and identity was married lady. That's who she was. Married...Who would she be if that were no longer the case? (timestamp 36:10)

I think this is an interesting question and I might write a longer post about identity later on. What is your primary occupation and identity?

The dogs sniffed and bayed uselessly, finally catching a whiff of a rabbit and leading the searchers on another fruitless chase. Even experts are, in the end, dogs. (timestamp 5:31:21)

Dogs be dogs.

Can a man live with a woman for so many years, sleep beside her so many nights without the molecules in his body palpably rearranging themselves in the event of her death? (timestamp 7:07:51)

This comes up in fiction all the time. (A Spell of Winter comes to mind.) People seem to think that their body will somehow react when someone they care for dies and they'll know immediately. What a weird thing to think.

Nothing in the world removes the ills a wife causes like the balm of a mistress. (timestamp 8:33:27)

So much defense of purposefully becoming a mistress.

The Age of Disappearing Women. It had been going on forever. Thousands of us vanished with not a single police officer searching, not a word from the newspapers, only our long absences and quiet returns, if we ever returned at all. (timestamp 8:36:30)

So many missing people.

...petting a panting Labrador who cuddled up beside her. She laughed when the dog licked her chin and kissed him back for good measure. (timestamp 8:46:11)

There were a lot of dogs in the book. I heartily approve of this. (There is a description of a sad, violent dog death, though, so be aware.)

Hat mentions (why hats?):

I wore a pleated skirt, a button-up blouse, a loose cardigan and stockings, fake pearls, and a smart new hat. (timestamp 5:28) 

....she removed her hat, so I did, too...(timestamp 12:48)

My hat was still on my head - it had barely budged. (timestamp 22:33) 

Colleen wore a knitted woolen hat and pulled it down over her ears. (timestamp 1:12:30)

I packed my warmest clothes - boots and hats and gloves...(timestamp 2:15:15)

My hat had started to fall and he pulled it back onto my head, down over my ears...(timestamp 3:20:43)

...bundled up in a hat and coat. (timestamp 8:19:47)

...and tipped his hat. (timestamp 9:38:23)

...and put on his hat, pulled it down over her forehead.(timestamp 9:42:39)

...had forgotten to wear his hat...(timestamp 9:46:24)

18 comments:

  1. I am fascinated by the Christie disappearance. It's so far fetched that she would have planned it all to make it look like her husband killed her...and yet it sure looks like that's what she did. It's one thing to write great mystery novels and next level to pull it off in real life (assuming that's what happened).

    I read this book a few years ago but then ending was a miss for me. It just seemed like too much of a coincidence and too much of a copy of a Christie novel. But I always like hearing the story of the disappearance so in that sense I enjoyed it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, wow, I really liked the ending. I thought it was really clever how the author made the few facts known about the case fit into the story. I guess it's all in the eye of the beholder.

      I am also very fascinated by the Christie case. I lean towards she wanted to embarrass her husband, but didn't realize/know/anticipate that the media coverage/police search would get so intense. But who knows?

      Delete
  2. I read this book! And I liked it, but I remember that I didn't LOVE it. I would probably give it four stars, like you. I'm reading Birchie's comment above- I would have changed up the ending, but made it even MORE Christie-ish. Like all the suspects gathered together while the detective explains what happened. i mean, if you're going to write a book about Agatha Christie, you might as well go all in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL. I don't actually care much for Christie's books (great plots, of course, but stiff characters and dated writing), so I liked the ending a lot more than the two of you. I thought it was a more modern twist on a Christie book and I like that it didn't have ALL of the tropes. But I hear your complaint and can understand why Christie fans might think the book didn't go far enough.

      Delete
  3. I only recently heard about Christie's disappearance, and so the premise is interesting to me BUT I tend to dislike historical fiction, and I really dislike one of the authors who is quoted on the cover!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Historical fiction isn't really my favorite, either, but I'm so fascinated by the real-life Christie disappearance that this book appealed to me. I thought the writing was sort of meh, but I was riveting by the plot.

      Delete
  4. I hadn't heard about Christie's disappearance! I've read a handful of her books, and thought they were OK but not my favorites. I dislike stories about mistresses too, and hearing that this book is pro-mistress, written from her point of view, really turns me off. But I did enjoy reading your review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know if the book is necessarily pro-mistress, but it is from the point of view of the mistress. I definitely can see why that would be a dealbreaker for someone, though, especially if you aren't necessarily into Agatha Christie as an author or a historical figure.

      Delete
  5. I also read this book and it was fascinating to me! I have to read more historic fiction because it feels so much more interesting to me than just regular general fiction. So good!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really thought that how the author matched up the facts from the real disappearance to this fictionalized account was smart. I'm starting to realize I like historical fiction if it's based a real event/person and I know something about what it's based on.

      Delete
  6. I have a love-hate relationship with historical fiction about real people. But I've heard this is quite an interesting one. I've read an awful lot about (and of) Christie, so maybe this perspective would be an interesting one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's really more focused on the story of the mistress and while Christie's disappearance is a central plot point, I think people who really wanted an Agatha Christie book were disappointed in it. Beware!

      Delete
  7. I have this book on my shelf - I'm so fascinated by the Agatha Christie disappearance and what the real purpose was! For some reason, I didn't realize this wasn't from Christie's POV! I guess I should have read the synopsis first, haha.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I never read the synopsis. I like to go in blind. LOL. But maybe that would lead to disappointment in this case. It's not about Agatha Christie, that's for sure!

      Delete
  8. This subject is endlessly fascinating to me, and this sounds like an interesting way to approach it. I don't actually think it's weird to think that you will physically know when someone you love dies - or not weird to think it somehow SHOULD be true. I also don't think it really is true.
    I'm always interested in how people justify adultery. In a very few cases I do, in fact, think it can be justified, but not in most, and it's fascinating how inventive and many the ways are that people find to delude themselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will happily debate the Agatha Christie affair for hours. It's so inconsequential and yet so very juicy!

      Justifying adultery is fascinating. This character really twisted herself up over it and I'm not sure she even convinced herself, let alone the readers.

      Delete
  9. What an interesting concept! And yeah, minus the pro cheating part. Ick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The defense of adultery was interesting, at least. I hadn't heard it before!

      Delete