Welcome to Week Two of Cool Bloggers Book Club (CBBC) for The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton. This week we'll be discussing chapters 19-26.
There is an Internet archive of the novel and all page numbers I use in this post will be from that edition.
*******************
What happened in these chapters?
![]() |
| J's copy of the book! |
May and Archer get married.
*******************
Hat mentions (why hats?):
tall hat and pearlgrey gloves (page 180)
a dark coil of hair under a hat (page 186)
limp Leghorn hat anchored to her head (page 208)
a wreath of ivy on her hat (page 211)
He found his hat and stick and went forth into the street. (page 231)
under her dark hat (page 232)
a long veil about her hat (page 239)
lifted his hat (page 249)
a wide flourish of his hat (page 250)
"No: but you can help — " M. Riviere paused, turned his hat about in his still carefully gloved hands (page 252)
M. Riviere again looked into his hat, as if considering whether these last words were not a sufficiently broad hint to put it on and be gone. (page 253)
![]() |
| Foxy shows off Jenny's library book. |
*******************
Things I looked up:
monumental Britannia ware of their lodging house breakfast-table (page 192) - Britannia metal (also called britannium, Britannia ware, or Vickers White Metal) is a specific type of pewter alloy, favored for its silvery appearance and smooth surface. It was first produced in 1769 or 1770. After the development of electroplating with silver in 1846, Britannia metal was widely used as the base metal for silver-plated household goods and cutlery. The abbreviation EPBM on such items denotes "electroplated Britannia metal". Britannia metal was generally used as a cheaper alternative to electroplated nickel silver (EPNS), which is more durable. I could have read about this all day.
![]() |
| Teapot, Britannia metal Daderot, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons |
memoirs of the Baroness Bunsen (page 193) - Baroness Frances Waddington Bunsen (1791 – 1876) was a Welsh painter, author and diplomatic hostess, wife of Christian Charles Josias Bunsen, and the older sister of Lady Llanover. After her husband's death in 1860, she published a memoir of his life: A Memoir of Baron Bunsen, Drawn Chiefly from Family Papers, by His Widow, Frances, Baroness Bunsen (1868).
quant a soi (page 201) - a French expression referring to a reserved, distant, or aloof attitude, often characterized by a refusal to reveal one's true thoughts or feelings. It implies a sense of personal space, self-possession, or holding back. The common phrase is "rester sur son quant-à-soi" (to remain aloof/reserved).
Leghorn hat (page 208) - a classic, durable straw hat made from the fine, bleached straw of a specific Italian wheat (Triticum vulgare), historically imported from Leghorn, Italy, since the 1700s.
expiatory (page 210) - serving to make amends for
chamfered (page 218) - beveled, grooved
dansant (page 221) - informal or small dance; tea dance
Saconnet (page 225) - The Sakonnet River is a tidal strait in the state of Rhode Island which flows approximately 14 miles (23 km) between Mount Hope Bay and Rhode Island Sound. (I think)
Cowes (page 234) - an English seaport town on the Isle of Wight
Baden (page 234) - a historical territory in southern Germany
*******************
Lines of notes:
It was less trouble to conform with the tradition and treat May exactly as all his friends treated their wives than to try to put into practice the theories with which his untrammelled bachelorhood had dallied. There was no use in trying to emancipate a wife who had not the dimmest notion that she was not free; and he had long since discovered that May's only use of the liberty she supposed herself to possess would be to lay it on the altar of her wifely adoration. (page 196)
"Newland never seems to look ahead," Mrs. Welland once ventured to complain to her daughter; and May answered serenely: "No; but you see it doesn't matter, because when there's nothing particular to do he reads a book." (page 222-223)
She had grown tired of what people called "society" ; New York was kind, it was almost oppressively hospitable; she should never forget the way in which it had welcomed her back; but after the first flush of novelty she had found herself, as she phrased it, too "different" to care for the things it cared about — and so she had decided to try Washington, where one was supposed to meet more varieties of people and of opinion. (page 241)
*******************
Last week's homework:
Sarah sent along some photos of Mansion Hill in Madison, Wisconsin. Check it out!
*******************
Questions to ponder:
1) What do you think of Newland's opinion of May and the way he thinks about her and describes her to himself?
2) Why did Newland pretend not to see Ellen after he hadn't seen her in a long time? Why is he a tool? Frankly, why is Ellen a tool? Why is everyone who isn't Mrs. Mingott a tool?
3) WHAT DID BEAUFORT DO? I'm honestly more interested in Beaufort at this point. What is causing his financial ruin and what do we think is going to be the outcome of this mess?
4) Is the French tutor just a plot contrivance for Wharton or do you think he's going to come back?
*******************
Homework for you:
Scavenger hunt! I want you all to pick a word that you're going to look for in next week's reading. I do this with the word "hat." Pick a common word and see how often it appears in the text - e.g., horse, lunch, tree, rug, etc. - and then report back next week. Bonus points if you tell us in the comments this week what your word will be. I, obviously, will be looking for the word hat.
*******************
Upcoming CBBC schedule:
Monday, March 2: Wrap-up

.jpeg)


.png)
Newland thinks May is a naive young thing he can mold initially, but with the passing of time he realizes she has some more depth ( see that paragraph from chapter 26) and maybe she's got more on than he knows.
ReplyDeleteHis own naivete is coming to the forefront. He's discovered he's outside the family discussion on Ellen, he lives more and more in his own mind- yearning for Ellen is his reality.
I think the tutor is a method to get more info about Ellen, to give Archer an ally in his belief about Ellen, and to provide another glimpse of what would become of Archer if he throws caution to the winds.
starting to feel a little sorry for Archer, though he won't throw off the shackles of polite society. Sociery's narrow-mindedness and insular nature really displayed in a true, cruel light here.
I think Sarah said it down below and I think it's right that if Archer were with Ellen, he'd be pining for May. He's a grass is always greener guy, I think.
DeleteGosh, I am missing a lot because I do not feel at all bad for Archer. Yes, he's constrained by society, but he doesn't seem very self-reflective about that.
As always I completely ignore your question prompts (SORRY!...wait, you told us not to apologize). I actually feel sorry for Archer. I know you think he's a twat, but I think his life sounds MISERABLE.
ReplyDeleteI think May is actually extremely calculating and intelligent. She wears the veneer well, but I think underneath it all, she's far more aware of what's happening around her then she lets on.
Beaufort is sleazy and deserves whatever he has coming to him, but I do feel bad for his wife.
I feel like this book would have been scandalous at the time it came out? Talking about pre-marital sex and affairs and thinks of that ilk.
I LOVE that you could read about fancy teapots all day, Engie. LOVE IT!
The discussion prompts are arbitrary. Talk about what you want to talk about!
DeleteI definitely think May is smarter about how society functions than Archer. I don't know if she's truly smart or able to problem solve, but she definitely has a lot more know-how about relationships and her EQ is a lot higher than Archer's.
I was slightly obsessed with Britannia ware. I thought it was just going to be some sort of pottery or ceramic pattern or something and then suddenly I was into electroplating! Imagine! A lot of times in the things I look up, it quickly become clear that I am not smart enough to follow along, but very occasionally something like this comes up and I become momentarily obsessed with multiple tabs open and I see how people become savants on niche topics.
Codex: What I said before. May is not an intellectual and has no ambition to be one. She's extremely conniving and manipulative. He's in a loveless marriage. He's not a twat. He thought he could mold her into intellectual conversations. There is nothing there. No connection between them.
ReplyDeleteWow! We are not reading this in the same way. I don't think May is "conniving" or "manipulative." (And, wow for those gendered terms, too!) Am I supposed to feel bad for him that he's in a loveless marriage he fought for and wanted to start sooner? He's a twat. He can't read the room or read what May is actually about.
DeleteCodex: Engie.1. Keep in mind that I've read the book. I never said I like them, but people are people.
Delete2. Manipulative and conniving are gender neutral. Men do it too.
We can read a book differently. I have no issue with that.
3. I do have an issue with all men are bad statements. The patriarchy hurts men too. (I'm not talking about the evil kind). I've tried to explain it but Nance is better at it. Don't needle people just because of gender and because they are accessible in the comment section. You wanted a discussion about a book.
If you want a women's blog. State so. Men will respect your choice.
Yes. I'd describe madoff as manipulative because he was.
I did enjoy your background and object research because I wouldn't have looked all that up.
Yes, men can be describe as manipulative and conniving, but they never are. It's like how bossy gets used as a pejorative for women and girls. It's NOT gender neutral in any way.
DeleteOf course patriarchy is bad for everyone, but if you think it's worse for Archer than May and Ellen, I don't know what to tell you. Archer gets to make actual decisions and have his own money and have a degree of freedom. This is not a blog exclusively for women, but it is a space dominated mostly by women and we discuss how hard it is to be women in the 2025 timeline AND the 1870s timeline. I read this book through the lens of a woman who has experienced violence and discrimination at the hands of men and that's how my views of the book are shaped. It's absolutely fair to have a different reading, but to say someone's reading is WRONG is against the ethos of the book club we have developed here. You don't think Archer's a twat? Great. That's your view and feel free to make arguments about it and others can agree or disagree. But there's no need to use gendered language or attacks on other people's readings/viewpoints/personality.
I'm not deleting this comment or any of the other comments you've made here because I do think you make some fair points and I enjoy a spirited discussion. It's no fun if everyone feels the same way about a book! But coming in with "men matter too" is not going to win you a lot of friends in the comment section.
I think Archer is conniving too. I mean the whole "I need to go to Boston." "I need to go to DC." He's not as good at conniving as May is, though. Probably because I think he feels a little bit of guilt. May is just trying to keep her marriage in tact. I don't *really* believe back in Florida that she would have let Archer go to marry his mistress. She just knows that if she calls Archer out on these things he's going to backpedal because he is kind of a weak willed person.
DeleteI think Archer is conniving too. I mean the whole "I need to go to Boston." "I need to go to DC." He's not as good at conniving as May is, though. Probably because I think he feels a little bit of guilt. May is just trying to keep her marriage in tact. I don't *really* believe back in Florida that she would have let Archer go to marry his mistress. She just knows that if she calls Archer out on these things he's going to backpedal because he is kind of a weak willed person.
DeleteThe fact that Archer ‘thought he could mold’ May into being what he wanted in a wife is pretty much proof that he is, indeed, a twat. He never loved her for who she was, he loved the idea of having a pretty young wife to mansplain the world to. She was his canvas. When it turned out that she wasn’t interested in that, he realized his mistake. If he hadn’t been in such a hurry to marry, perhaps he could have figured it out. May is perhaps manipulative, but no more so than Archer. She gave him an out before the wedding, gave him a chance to find happiness elsewhere. But they are both very much tied to the conventions of their time and place. Ellen is more willing to take chances, to divorce and bear all of the shame that goes with that.
DeleteIt's interesting that although I remember a lot of this book, I have no recollection of the French tutor. I'm trying to figure out what his significance is- on this reading, I felt like the scene where he meets and talks to Archer was kind of boring. It seems like all that information cold have been conveyed in a quicker manner. So, I'll be interested to see if he comes back, i.e. if there's a real reason for him to be in this story.
ReplyDeleteI go back and forth with being annoyed with Archer and feeling sorry for him. Mostly I feel sorry for him. Whenever I read books about this time period, I'm struck by how little people were allowed to know the person their spouse prior to the wedding. He can't really be blamed for thinking (hoping) there's more to May than meets the eye. I mean intellectually- there's no question she's got a lot going on under the surface, but for her it's all about society and her place in it. I love the silent exchange at the end of chapter 26 that you quoted- the fews words they said and the long paragraph of what May was really communicating to Archer.
I still really like this book, although I find some passages to be long and boring. I'm thinking Wharton thought they were important to give readers of that time period context of what was going on.
I'll be curious to see what everyone thinks of Archer at the end of this book!
Jenny, I thought a lot of these scenes were boring, although I could have used twice as long for the wedding scene and more Mrs. Mingott!
DeleteI mean, I think Archer *can* be blamed. He wanted the marriage sped up! May and her family wanted a long engagement. If that had happened, he *might* have been able to see that May wasn't what he wanted. I mean, he IS bound by societal expectations and standards, but what is the worst that could happen if he didn't abide by those? He'd not be welcomed at parties that seem to bore him? Maybe he'd lose his job and he'd have to go get one in Indianapolis? I know that wasn't done then, but I just find myself losing patience with him.
I'm at the point where my brain is no longer able to comprehend the story, so I'm turning the pages and doing the best that I can. I know that a lot of people love this book, and I respect that but I'm also dying to hear why and to figure out what I'm missing.
ReplyDeleteReading about your research into Britannia metal is by far the best part of the book so far!
Ha! I really was so surprised that it wasn't some stoneware from a quarry in Wales or something!
DeleteThis post delighted me to no end! I love how you write, and seriously, your blog post is way better than the book! At this point, I think Archer is a huge twat, and I love that May is onto him! Good for her! I mean yes, they are in a loveless marriage, and I should feel sorry for them.
ReplyDeleteThat is such a nice compliment. Thank you.
DeleteYeah, maybe we should feel sorry for them, but I'm mostly just annoyed with them. I think it KILLS me that they don't just say what they mean. That would irk me in a contemporary novel, too.
Oh, I feel as if you've left out some of the most interesting and important parts in this summary, such as the feelings Archer and Ellen discuss at their private lunch, and the boundaries they set for their future together, yet apart. That scene was so full of pathos and heartbreak.
ReplyDeleteI also loved the scene at the Wellands' wherein they try to work out who will have to attend the reception for the Blenkers given by another old respected NY family (more recycled names!). All of the societal rules and norms come into play as well as Archer seeing what could very well be a glimpse of Future Him when Mr. Welland begs off due to all of his trivial time constraints and habits.
One important note regarding your assertion that Beaufort is "basically supporting" Countess Olenska. Not quite: what little money she and her aunt Medora have is invested with Beaufort, and they live off the interest/dividends/profits. If his business goes under, her money is gone. Think of Bernie Madoff as a general example. It's not like Ellen is providing favours for Beaufort and he leaves a twenty on her dresser or something.
On to the questions:
1. Archer is becoming more and more disillusioned with May. He is starting to see her as almost a carbon copy of her mother and all the other society matrons in New York. She's perfectly happy with the status quo and has no desire for anything else. This disappoints Archer; he wanted more, especially after reuniting with Ellen, who shares more of his interests and is different and not so predictable and conventional. Archer harbored thoughts of enlightening May and opening new worlds to her, and she just plain doesn't want any of that. He used to be enamored of her girlish innocence. He is surprised to actually find threads of cruelty and snobbery in her.
2. LOL! I don't think everyone is a tool, but then I'm extraordinarily fond of books set in Victorian and Edwardian eras. I like plots complicated by manners of the time, and I appreciate all the romantic tension, the Said But Unsaid. Do I like this sort of bullshit in real life? Hell no. I am direct and outspoken.
3. Beaufort is a nefarious businessman. He's like an Olden Times Bernie Madoff. He took people's money as a safe investment, then made lots of backroom deals and bad (probably illegal) speculations with it, and now, if he can't get some legitimate funds to cover his losses, all these investors, like Medora and Ellen and lots of others in NY, are going to be broke and the Beauforts will be blacklisted along with financially ruined.
4. Oh, the French tutor and PRIVATE SECRETARY TO COUNT OLENSKA. He's far from a plot contrivance. Edith Wharton is a master of Irony. Nothing (and no one) in this book is by accident. Please think about him again, and remember how Ellen got to America.
@Nance- thanks for these comments- they get to the heart of a lot of the plot. And thanks for highlighting that, despite what everyone seems to think, Ellen isn't involved with Beaufort in that way. He's trying, she's playing it off, because his wife is her cousin and she doesn't play those games, esp with family who has been kind. Everyone thinks she's having affairs, and she's just trying to live an interesting and quiet life. The high society have minds like sewers, for all their professed piety. .
DeleteRight, well, if you want to write the summary for next week, Nance, have at it! LOL. I'm struggling to figure out what's important and what's not in this book because, frankly, it all seems minor and petty to me.
DeleteYour explanation of what's going on with Beaufort makes me sense now. There's a line about "the few pennies that Medora Manson has left are all in Beaufort's hands." Interesting. But what are Medora and Ellen doing all day? (I feel a bit like Mrs. Welland. Please account for your time.)
YES TO A NANCE GUEST POST!!! I really want to like this book, but I've missed something and could use some coaching.
DeleteI feel so seen by Birchie's comment. I don't dislike the book, but I am listening to it and I fear I've missed some bits and pieces along the way.
DeleteI do wonder if the message is simply, no one can every be satisfied. It is mind blowing that Archer couldn't wait to marry May, and now he seems to think of her as behaving like all those who've gone before her and that makes Ellen so much more interesting to him.
I appreciate this info on Beaufort - comparing him to a modern day money guru who messes with people's finances to better himself, aha - now I get that part.
I cannot for the life of me figure out the tutor's role and how he fits into everything, but I'm looking forward to finding out.
I thought it was so weird that Archer wanted to see Ellen, but then walked away. I think he's arrogant, or maybe he's afraid - like he doesn't trust himself and he lives in fear of what society would say if his true feelings were revealed.
Yes, I think you're right, Ernie. I'm pretty sure the ending is going to be that everyone is miserable because there's no way to be happy in such strict confines of the roles they feel they must play.
DeleteI do think Archer is just scared that his life would implode if he wanted to marry Ellen. But could he just keep her as a mistress? Was that done?
Ugh I feel bad for Archer, even though he never should have married May. But! If he had somehow managed to buck convention and make a go of it with Ellen, wouldn't he just be pining for May? Definitely a grass-is-always-greener kind of guy, yes? Beaufort did some shady business, I fear. Whatever will his wife do without new clothes to "clap on her back" the second they arrive? I was just listening to the new John Grisham, and he is the king of the character invented to save or twist the plot, so I must say the tutor is one of those... I guess if we are thinking in terms of the social critique of the book, is he, like, a way to really SEE the dirty grasping new money America? Like, even the old money Americans are just ... savages... compared to the real old money abroad and all of their social climbing bullshit is futile-- is what I think she's saying?
ReplyDeleteI think the grass is always greener is definitely a good lens for looking at Archer. He's never going to be happy, is he? Is that the point? No one can actually be happy?
DeleteThe wedding scene - Poor Mrs. Mingott, the descriptions are SO MEAN. She’s so fat that there is nowhere for her to sit in the church, and her family lives in terror of her being seen in society. WOW. Just WOW.
ReplyDeleteThen, once they are married…””Darling!” Archer said - and suddenly the same black abyss yawned before him and he felt himself sinking into it, deeper and deeper, while his voice rambled on smoothly and cheerfully…” A black abyss? BOY, does he NOT want to get married. And yet he pushed so hard to have it happen sooner. Why? Was May’s perception in last week’s reading correct, that he feared if they didn’t get married quickly he would lose interest?
The French tutor - I did not see him as the Count’s secretary, but here we are. Why was his secretary working as a French tutor in England? I guess he was fired as secretary after helping Ellen to escape, but then rehired? Is it a gig job, vs a full time position? If he helped Ellen to escape initially, why was he in support of her returning to the Count (until he wasn’t)? This story is definitely twisty turny.
What about Archer repeatedly recognizing the dismissive way his mother in law treats his father in law, and thinking, Uh oh, this is what I have coming… and what of Archer’s wife being skilled in Archery. There’s some wordplay for you, right?
I enjoyed the scene between Archer and Ellen, where we finally get a glimpse of what she sees in him. He showed her (Somehow, I guess I missed it at the time) the value and beauty of the way of life for the New York elite of the time, even as he bristles against all of it. And what about him being disappointed that he cannot mold May to be the person he wants her to be? He wants something different, not decades of a boring life so constrained. Yet he works so hard to live this constrained life of manners and mores.
Beaufort’s bad investments. There is a mention of railroads…I guess a lot of people lost a lot of money in railroads, yeah? This came up in The Gilded Age and also Downton Abbey (which takes place over 50 years later at that point, so I guess it’s a continuing gamble). You ask what he did…it sounds like he’s made some bad investments with people’s money, perhaps a Ponzi scheme. A lot of people are going to be hurting, I think, if he goes down. So he has to keep spending a lot on fancy yachts and clothes and race horses, to keep up the appearance of success. Perhaps he is just spending the money he is supposed to be investing, or perhaps he is deep in debt, I’m not sure.
I am going to look for the word ‘teeth’ or even ‘tooth’, though I think I said that last time and I completely forgot. But I will try!
Wharton's descriptions of Mrs. Mingott are SO MEAN. I hate it.
DeleteI guess I'm taking everyone's idea from last week that Archer was horny and that's why he wanted to move up the marriage as truth, but I don't know if there's any evidence before or after in the book. I'm struggling with everyone's motivations, though, because it's just a life I can't ever imagine having.
Now that I read that scene again, it does seem like Beaufort made bad investments and/or gambled money away. The quick growth in industrialization during this time, including in railroads, is simmering away in the background of the novel.
Codex: I think Engie and this is an observation not criticism that you have a hard time empathizing with other people. You like characters that you can project yourself into. Aoi has multiple POVs. It's their experience and their time and their circumstances. And it needs to be appreciated as such.
ReplyDeleteI don't think I've made any secret on this blog that one of the reasons I read fiction is because I don't always understand other people and their motives. It's what's frustrating about this book for me. The motivations of people are confusing and not explained well enough for me to figure out what's going on. This is probably a me problem, not a Wharton problem, but the characters don't actually say what they mean or think things in a way that makes sense to me.
DeleteThis doesn't really have multiple POVs. It's third-person following Archer. Sure, there are other characters, but it's not like we have any real info on Ellen who is off-page for most of the book or anyone else. I don't know why you're making the claim that it has more than one POV.
Codex: I apologize we posted at the same time. I was referring to Js comment which you removed. I didn't sign in so can't remove the one below. I haven't read your whole blog so I did not know that.
DeleteIt's a tougher read then because the characters in this book don't say what they mean. Half the time they don't even know how to navigate the world they're in.
Stick with it. Nance explains it well.
Codex: You couldn't express why you didn't like Carol. But if another person loved her she must be likeable?
ReplyDelete(For the rest of you following, this is a reference to the main character in the AppleTV show Pluribus.)
DeleteCarol is meant to be unlikeable in the first few episodes. As I explained before, she's self-absorbed and is upset that her writing has become so popular. She sees her own work as not important and is snobby about her fans. I listened to a podcast where the creator, Vince Gilligan, talked about how Helen was a stand-in for the fans. Helen was instantly fun and seemed to have a good perspective about the success Carol was having. Because Helen liked Carol, there must be something there. If not for the character of Helen, I would not have cared about whether or not Carol was left alone in the alien invasion and would have stopped watching after the second episode. But the writers KNEW that - it was done purposefully. Of course I ended up rooting for her by the end (although Manousos was more interesting to me personally). If you disagree with the writers and creator of the purpose of the Helen character, that's fine, but that's WHY she was there. If this show didn't have Helen as a character, Carol would just be a snotty drunk. *shrug* I've explained this multiple times, but if you don't think it's a good enough explanation, good on you. But I have expressed it. You just don't listen.
I felt like these Chapters were kind of like The Two Towers, you know? Like the middle of the story where the characters are trying to get where they are going, but nothing truly happens that is interesting - it's just lots of Ents and elves and slogging through forest and fire. I guess there is a bit of character development - the defining of of Archer and May's marriage (that whole archery scene!), another layer of Ellen and Archer's relationship unpeeled... But no one makes any choices except to keep on keeping on.
ReplyDeleteI did enjoy some of the description of Society's quirks. The whole bit in Chapter 26 about it being vulger to be wearing the current Parisian fashions "as soon as they were out of the Custom House, instead of letting then mellow under lock and key." It's that kind of society rule that gives me a sense of what Archer is dealing with here, this combination of wealth, extravagance, but also desire not to stick out or be ostentatious.
Do we think Archer is bored? He seems uninterested in his job. He seems not that inspired by spending the rest of his life with May. He even seems annoyed about the whole Ellen thing - he has opinions but is kind of inert about the whole situation. I think he needs a bit of direction in life. Like go feed the orphans or something, you know?
So on a tangent -
I have a friend who lives in Western Massachusetts and she has been to the Mount years ago. She says the grounds were beautiful. The wild thing is inside they had mannequins/ dioramas of scenes from Wharton's novels. This I want to see.
Can you imagine having new clothes and then not wearing them? Ha! I would definitely ignore/miss all these rules, too.
DeleteYes, Archer is bored. He's bored with his job, his wife, and his environs. I'd feel terrible for him, but I don't really because imagine what the lives are like for 90% of other people living in the US at the time!
I'd love to go to the Mount. It sounds beautiful. I wish we had a Massachusetts correspondent!
This is a great analogy about the 2 Towers--it felt like it was building up to something, but it was definitely a slower section.
DeleteMansion Hill looks a helluva lot nicer than your average Ramada Inn!
ReplyDeleteRight? And I imagine a lot of it is student housing.
DeleteI'm having a hard time empathizing with Archer. I understand he's married someone he finds underwhelming; however, he could have broken off the engagement and saved himself and May the life of a loveless marriage. She even questioned him before the wedding if he really did want to go through with it and he said yes. She knows he's got doubts and here was his chance to step up and defy the society he finds so stifling and yet he didn't. Yes, the repercussions of doing so would be severe, but being a rebel comes at a price and you either step up or put up.
ReplyDeleteI do empathize with Ellen being shunned as a divorced woman and her financial dependence on Beaufort. As a woman she certainly has fewer options in society than men. That being said, she is just as responsible as Archer for entertaining having an affair. He's married to her cousin and that's not a secret to her. Also, IMO that should be a big red flag to her. If he's willing to screw around on his wife, what's to say he won't do it to her at some point?
Again my favorite person in this book is May. She let Archer know via "the code they had both been trained in," that he is not going to Washington on business and as Engie said, he is a liar, liar pants on fire! I think he underestimates her at his own peril.
I have not read ahead, but I think a fun plot twist would be for May to divorce Archer and run off to Paris with the tutor, M. Riviere, leaving poor Archer completely flummoxed LOL!
Yes, I guess I don 't understand why he just didn't break it off with May before the wedding? Sure, it would have been a scandal, but now a divorce would REALLY be a scandal. I truly am struggling understanding Archer's motivations.
DeleteYour ending is better than mine, which is that everyone ends up miserable. Ha!